The Towns

(Also appeared in the March 24, 2005 Christian Science Monitor)

In M. Night Shyamalan’s incredible The Village, there is a small band of people who speak in an archaic register filled with “thee” and “thou,” who settle their policy differences through town meetings, and who live a simple life of chores and small pleasures. The adults in this Village, surrounded by a menacing forest, all came from the “Towns,” where, to hear them tell it, violence reigns and venality is the norm.

Judging by public life today, many of us would like to live in this Village. You can tell, in part, by what the political parties are peddling. On the Right, the rhetoric of values, if taken at face value, sounds downright Athenian in its high-mindedness. Recapture personal morality and life will be simpler, the choices clearer.

On the Left, there is an emerging back-to-basics consensus that includes a sort of pugnacious honesty coupled with a faith in the little guy’s eventual rising. Howard Dean’s ascent to DNC Chair was fueled by equal parts enthusiasm for his honest style, and infatuation with the idea that the Dean “netroots” would somehow re-empower the masses. He embodied a story of yesterday (the forthright outsider makes good) and brought a veneer of new technology. But, what ultimately made Dean palatable was his eight-point plan to revitalize the party, a plan which amounts to little more than “be more organized” — a back-to-basics tack if ever there was one.

Each side, viewing itself at a sort of inflection point where either legacy or survival are at stake, would like to turn back the clock. Each side yearns to recapture something it feels is lost.

But, it can’t happen. The fundamental characteristic of nostalgia is that it is a desire for a time that never really was.

Some of my friends seem to inhabit an alternate America. Sometime I live there, too. In this America, Jed Bartlett is president and there is a campaign going on to succeed him. This is America as portrayed by The West Wing. In this America, everybody is smart, speaks quickly and amusingly, and there is always an abiding sense of political idealism. Operatives remind one another, at seemingly every turn, about why they got into politics in the first place. They’re in it to make a difference. Sometimes these people lose their way, but there’s always a character on screen who can gently remind them that democracy is really all about helping people.

In this America, a Texas congressman named Matt Santos is running an underdog campaign for the presidential nomination. But he is giving his jaded DC-insider campaign manager fits. Not only will he not run so-called “negative ads,” but he insists that, if he criticizes his opponent, he will only do so personally, in his own voice. He wanders off of the talking points and doesn’t follow the script for important meetings. The sophisticates that surround him all gnash their teeth at his starry-eyed democracy mumbo-jumbo and Frank Capra antics.

It’s not that these sophisticates are against ideals (they have them themselves), but they know what must be done in order to win. Eggs must be broken to make an omelet, and Matt Santos doesn’t seem to have the stomach to break them.

But, watch the camera linger on the nodding faces of ordinary citizens as they listen to Santos’ powerful ideas. Watch the gaggle of trailing reporters grow everywhere he goes in the New Hampshire towns he visits. In this America, the one portrayed in The West Wing, refreshing honesty and fair play are working. Santos has a chance to break through, and we’re all rooting for him, at home on our sofas.

We know Santos will do well. There may be twists and turns but his message will resonate and his honesty will triumph.

But it’s a fake. Switch off prime time and we see how incredibly hard it is to persevere as the straight-talking candidate. The Howard Dean presidential campaign collapsed in a scream. The John McCain “straight talk express,” four years earlier, fizzled as push-poll fueled sniping between his and George W. Bush’s campaign reached a crescendo. The former poster boy of telling it like it is from outside the hallowed halls, Jesse Ventura, is now brought up more in jest than as a role model.

What keeps people in the Village, even in the face of strong temptations to visit the Towns, is a collective nightmare of what might happen if one steps across the border into the forest. The Village is a special place where the prevailing rules — those of the Towns — are in an enforced suspense.

Public life here, in real America, seems more of the venal Towns than of the upright Village. And, notwithstanding West Wing parables to the contrary, those who rise up seem to be the first struck down. Where is the hope? Must we abandon our ideals?

There are small signs of progress. Governor Dean has indeed ridden his plainspoken ethos to power — DNC Chair is nothing to sneeze at. Senator John McCain has recaptured the gloss lost in 2000 so well that he was actually touted as a vice presidential candidate for Senator John Kerry in 2004. Newly-minted Senator Barak Obama’s authentic voice and story have placed him on the short list of people who now really matter.

Those of us on our sofas, wishing real life were more like The West Wing, ought to look around and grab onto these stories. They ought ought to bring true hope, because they are believable. They tell us that just speaking up isn’t enough, we’ll need to do the hard work of persevering, too. Improvements won’t come about in the space of sixty minutes minus commercials, nor even in the space of one television season. But they will come.

We don’t need to move to the Village to hold onto its ideals. We just need to go looking for them here, in the Towns.

(c) 2005 The Christian Science Monitor. Used by permission.

One thought on “The Towns”

  1. Brad,

    I find the missing ingredient in your piece to be: Where are the great ideas that we can ALL rally around? I think we make a mistake as Democrats by thinking it is only a numbers games and that we just need to roust more voters. Minds need to be changed with great ideas.

    Why the Democrats are losing is not that they don’t have great ideas, it is just that the right has better ideas (for their cause) and more committed folk to support them (This has taken a lot of planning and happened over years). It is a fallacy to assume that we will find an untapped group of voters who will turn the tide for Democrats.

    However, in the same way a business needs to get market share with good planning and execution, that is what the Democrats need to do. How are we going to split, or take part of the market share from the Republicans? Howard Dean may or may not do the job, but he may be able to improve leadership by selecting and promoting people who can win people to our side in the war of ideas.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s